Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Oil & Gas Environmental and Climate Partnerships: Tackling Methane and VOC Leaks, Limiting Wastewater Spills, Developing Best Practices Standards, and Using Best Available Technologies



Oil and Gas Environmental and Climate Partnerships: Tackling Methane and VOC Leaks, Limiting Wastewater Spills, Developing Best Practices Standards, and Using Best Available Technologies

In recent years several oil & gas environmental and climate coalitions have sprung up to address environmental, climate, and public relations issues. The Oil & Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI), a voluntary group made up of CEOs, now represents about 30% of global oil & gas production with most large majors on board. Commitments to greenhouse gas emissions reduction are featured.  API’s The Environmental Partnership is another group developing environmental standards as is the Appalachian Basin based Center for Responsible Shale Development. ONE Future (short for Our Nation’s Energy Future) is a coalition of 16 companies including some midstream and utility companies. They have coordinated with the EPA and the DOE’s NETL to curb methane and total greenhouse gas emissions.

The Center for Responsible Shale Development (CRSD) involves oil and gas producers as well as environmental organizations. CRSD requires companies to meet certification requirements and to recertify periodically which is verified by a third party. CRSD is centered in and currently limited to the Appalachian Basin.

According to their website CRSD “has created 15 forward thinking, high performance standards focused on Air, Climate, Water, and Waste — standards that often exceed state and federal requirements.” These standards include effluent management and monitoring, water recycling requirements, surface and groundwater protection plan, tracking water usage, double-lined containment in pits and tanks and clean tank requirements, pre-drill baseline water testing and local aquifer analysis, some post-well groundwater monitoring, chemical disclosure, minimizing or discontinuing use of harmful chemicals where possible, developing leak-proof drill pads, safety and emergency response plans, limited flaring or venting of gas, documentation and reduction of engine emissions and compressor emissions of VOCs, NOx, particulates, CO, and other pollutants, utilization of controls and valves that limit ‘bleed-off’ and reduce emissions of methane and VOCs from tanks and compressors, utilizing the most sustainable completion practices, and emissions requirements for trucks hauling flowback water. They have a detailed comparison of CRSD standards vs. federal standards and the standards of three main Appalachian shale states (Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia) for each criteria.

API’s The Environmental Partnership shows 52 member oil & gas companies, including several majors and many large independent companies. One of their goals is to improve the industry’s environmental performance through standardization, collaboration, and learning. They have standards similar to the CRSD standards for low-bleed pneumatic controllers, minimizing emissions during liquids unloading, and leak detection and repair. They also present workshops, field trips, and just had their first annual conference. There are also other consortiums hosting conferences about environmental aspects of energy production and consumption.

A recent report by DOE’s National Energy Technology Lab (NETL) shows that members of the ONE Future coalition have very significantly reduced methane emissions far below standards they initially set for 2025. This shows that emissions reductions are happening quite successfully and feasibly. The NETL utilizes ‘life cycle analysis of energy technology and pathways.’ The report analyzed life cycle emissions from all phases of gas production including production, gathering & boosting, processing, transmission/storage/blowdowns, and distribution. In every category except distribution the ONE Future companies had achieved significantly less emissions than the rest of companies in the U.S. The reason is the addition of midstream and downstream utility companies with lots of legacy assets that include outdated leaky cast iron pipe which continues to be replaced but that replacement is slow-moving due to the nature of distribution systems being in highly populated areas. The ONE Future companies represent from 5-12% of U.S. natural gas production according to the report. The report also offers insights for prioritizing abatement of emissions sources according to both cost and product recovery. Some sources are continuous (ie. leaks in pipelines) and some are episodic (ie. liquids unloading and flaring). Life cycle analysis, inventory assessment, and cost analysis all can suggest which leak repairs to prioritize. 


Despite Trump administration efforts to rollback any federal rules regarding oil & gas industry methane emissions there is still a strong and successful push to decrease emissions. At some point this will likely extend to legacy well owners which will be more of an economic burden on these producers of marginal wells. As leak detection and repair technologies come down in price it will become more economically feasible. It could even be wise to offer some financial incentives or tax breaks to those legacy producer companies who can show methane emissions reductions. I think this is important since if methane emissions are tackled and reduced significantly, as has been done by the ONE Future companies then that would make natural gas even more sustainable as a bridge fuel toward the gradual and inevitable transition to renewables, storage, electrification, and clean energy.  

There are other partnerships and assessments involving academia, environmental orgs like Environmental Defense Fund, and industry, that have assessed leak detection needs and cost analysis, water management, spills and containment and other environmental issues. The U.S. EPA, the DOE, and other federal and state agencies are partnered in these assessments and studies.  

References:

Working together to tackle climate risks – by Darren Woods, in Energy Factor by ExxonMobil, Sept. 20, 2018

Exxon and Chevron join industry climate change group – by Ed Crooks, in Financial Times, Sept. 20, 2018

Natural Gas Companies Plug Leaks, Easily Surpass 2025 Goal – by Darren Barbee, in E & P Magazine, Nov. 25, 2018


www.theenvironmentalpartnership.org (website of API’s The Environmental Partnership)

Industry Partnerships and Their Role in Reducing Natural Gas Supply Chain Greenhouse Gas Emissions – by National Energy Technology Laboratory, May 1, 2018